Journal of Population Association of Iran

Journal of Population Association of Iran

Explaining the Fertility Differences of Iranian Provinces using Shannon Entropy Method

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Demography, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Demography, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
3 Master of Demography, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract
Despite the government's policies and efforts to boost fertility rates in Iran, the total fertility rate has been declining over the past two decades. This research aims to identify the weight of determinants of fertility in Iran's provinces and provide relevant policy recommendations. The study utilizes the mathematical methods of Shannon entropy and K-means clustering. The findings reveal that per capita gross product holds the highest weight coefficient among fertility determinants across the provinces. Furthermore, the influence of economic, social, and demographic indicators on fertility varies among provinces. Provinces with higher coefficients in social and demographic indicators tend to exhibit higher fertility rates. Notably, provinces such as Sistan and Baluchistan, North Khorasan, and South Khorasan, despite low economic indicators, maintain fertility levels above replacement level. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of understanding localized determinants of fertility and advocating for tailored policy interventions at the provincial level. Hence, a nuanced approach to regional politics becomes imperative. Furthermore, provinces like Alborz, Semnan, Gilan, Kermanshah, Ilam, and Isfahan, which score low on the overall index, should be prioritized for targeted population policies.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The population and fertility rates have long been a subject of concern for policymakers and researchers. Total fertility rate (TFR) has significantly declined over the past three decades in Iran. TFR dropped from 7 children per woman in the 1960s to 1.65 in 2023. This decline is attributed to various factors including increased female education, delayed marriages, greater independence for women, and the success of family planning programs. Despite government efforts to reverse this trend through pronatalist policies, such as financial incentives and family support programs, fertility continues to decline. This suggests that a more nuanced, regionally tailored approach is needed, as fertility determinants vary across Iran’s diverse ethnic and cultural regions. The study aims to explore these regional differences and examine whether uniform policies can effectively raise fertility levels across the country.
 
Methods and Data
This research is quantitative and employs the Shannon entropy method. The data was sourced from the Statistical Center of Iran, specifically the 2016 Population and Housing Census. The statistical population includes all provinces of Iran (31 provinces), with each province serving as the unit of analysis. Initially, the key factors influencing low fertility were identified through brainstorming and a review of previous research. Using Shannon’s entropy method, the weight of each factor was calculated and interpreted for all 31 provinces.
The weights assigned to each index were multiplied by the corresponding index values to calculate the score for each province in that specific function. Finally, the provinces were categorized based on their evaluation scores using k-means clustering. The clustering was then performed based on the provinces' scores in economic, social, and demographic functions.
 
Findings
Compared with 2016, the TFR in 2021 is much lower, although the government has taken some serious measures toward increasing fertility over recent decades. TFR decreased from 1.65 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2021, and such a reduction also has taken place for all provinces except Khuzestan. In 2021, Sistan and Baluchistan, South Khorasan, and Khuzestan had fertility rates above the replacement level. The provinces of Golestan, North Khorasan, and Razavi Khorasan had fertility rates near replacement level (2 to 2.1 children), while the remaining 25 provinces had fertility rates below replacement.
Table 1 presents the calculated weighting of fertility determinants using the entropy method. The results indicate that GDP per capita holds the highest rank and carries the most weight. Conversely, the ratio of women to men, with the lowest weight, is ranked last.        

Table 1- Normalized weight for each index using the Shannon entropy method

 
The provinces of Tehran, Khuzestan, and Bushehr have the highest economic ranks, while Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Sistan and Baluchistan, and North Khorasan rank the lowest. Of Iran's 31 provinces, only 11 have an economic score above the national average. Regarding economic clustering, 23 provinces fall into the third cluster (indicating poor conditions), while only six are in the first cluster, representing the best conditions. These findings highlight significant economic disparities across the provinces.
Regarding social function, the provinces of Sistan and Baluchistan, North Khorasan, and South Khorasan rank the highest, while Tehran, Semnan, and Alborz rank the lowest. Regarding social clustering, West Azarbaijan, Bushehr, and Qom are in the first cluster (better conditions), whereas Tehran, Semnan, and Alborz fall into the third cluster (weaker conditions). Regarding demographic function, Sistan and Baluchistan, Hormozgan, and North Khorasan hold the highest ranks, while provinces like Tehran and Isfahan rank among the lowest. In total function, Sistan and Baluchistan rank first, while Gilan, Semnan, and Alborz rank the lowest.
Finally, it is important to note that, given the significant ethnic and religious diversity across Iran's provinces, it was expected that ethnic and religious minorities would cluster together based on economic, social, and demographic factors. However, the observed clustering appeared to be more geographically based.
 
Conclusion and Discussion
Policies aimed at increasing fertility should consider both the economic and social diversity among provinces, as uniform policies may not yield the desired results. Given the provincial differences in fertility rates, each province should adopt policies that align with its specific demographic realities. Therefore, the unique conditions of each province or region, based on various indicators, must be considered when formulating policies. The second point is that, based on the overall index's function, we can conclude that in provinces where a balance among the indicators is maintained (such as Khuzestan), there is hope that the fertility rate will remain above replacement level and not decline. Additionally, considering the strong correlation between social indicators and total fertility rates, it can be inferred that if national policy shifts towards a regional focus—emphasizing the most influential indicators in each province—the potential for increasing TFR is within reach.
Based on these findings, it is recommended to implement a population policy targeting the central and northern provinces, with a focus on prioritizing and planning efforts to improve key social indicators. These include increasing the overall marriage rate, reducing divorce rates, lowering the average age of marriage for both men and women and providing support packages for families. These efforts should be coordinated across various departments. Second, the economic and demographic indicators in the eastern and western provinces of the country were less favorable. It is therefore necessary to closely monitor and address these indicators in these regions to stabilize and improve the total fertility rate.
 
Acknowledgments
This article is based on the master's thesis of the third author in the field of demography, completed at the Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the esteemed referees of both the thesis and the article.
Keywords

in Iran, Knowledge in Islamic University, 15(3), 8-25. [In Persian]. https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/889437
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & Alimandegarie, M. (2010). The Effects of Various Dimensions of   Women’s Autonomy on Fertility Behavior in Iran. Woman in Development & Politics8(1), 31- 51. [In Persian]. https://jwdp.ut.ac.ir/article_20442.html
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & Khajehsalehi, Z. (2013). An Assessment on the Impact of Women’s Autonomy, Education and Social Participation on Childbearing Intention in Sirjan City. Woman in Development & Politics11(1), 45-64. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2013.35477
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & Khani, S. (2014). Economic Insecurity and Fertility: Case Study of   Married Women in Sanandaj District. Journal of Population Association of Iran9(17), 37-76. [In Persian]. https://www.jpaiassoc.ir/article_20069.html
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., McDonald, P., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2009b). The Fertility Transition in Iran. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3198-3
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B., & Hosseini-Chavoshi, M. (2020). Socio- Economic Security and Fertility Intention in Tehran City. Journal of Population Association of Iran15(29), 211-238. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpai.2020.243924
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J.; P. McDonald & M. Hosseini Chavoshi (2007). The Path to Below Replacement Fertility in Iran, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 22(2), 91- 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.18356/1d5d44c7-en
Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J.; P. McDonald & M. Hosseini Chavoshi (2009a). Family Change and Continuity in Iran: Birth Control Use before First Pregnancy, Journal of Marriage Family, 71(5), 1309–1324.                                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00670.x
Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. & Hosseini, H. (2011). Ethnic Fertility Differences in Iran, Specialized Monthly Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 11(65), 126-141. [In Persian]. https://www.magiran.com/p1196360
Bagi, M. (2023). Reasons for delayed marriage and its determinants in Iran. Journal of Applied Sociology, 34(1), 31-50. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2022.134561.2312
Bagi, M.; Sadeghi, R. (2022). Marriage patterns of Iranian ethnic groups during the last two decades: Convergence or continuity of differences? Social and Cultural Strategy, 11(4), 437-472. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/scs.2022.162025
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., & Vincke, P. (2000). Evaluation and Decision Models: A Citical Perspective. Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1593-7
Brown, R. & Norville, C (2011). Theories of fertility, 1-25.
Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41(1), 5-30.                                       https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000142516
Erfani A. & McQuillan, K. (2008). Rapid fertility declines in Iran: Analysis of intermediate variables, Journal of Biosocial Sciences, 40(3), 459–478.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s002193200700243x
Erfani, A., Jahanbakhsh, R., & Kalantari, A. (2020). Individualism and Fertility Intentions. Journal of Population Association of Iran15(29), 239-264. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpai.2020.243925
Fathi, E (2022). Fertility Trends in Iran, [In Persian]. Accessable at: https://www.amar.org.ir/news/ID/18601
Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., Pinnelli, A. & Prati, S. (2013). Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of Italian women with one child, Population Research and Policy Review, 32(3), 373-413. https://doi.org/ 10. 1007/s11113-013-9266-9
Foroutan, Y. (2020). Sociological Analysis of Fertility Desires and Religious Affiliations in Iran. Journal of Culture-Communication Studies21(52), 9-33. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2020.174923.2753
Fuladi, M. (2019). An analysis of the consequences of fertility and population decline in Iran, Cultural and Social Knowledge, 3(43), 69-88. [In Persian]. https://www.noormags.ir/view/en/articlepage/1748823
Hajilo, V., Valizadeh, H., & Moghimi, Z. (2020). Identifying the components of organizing and empowering women heads of households in chaldoran. Women's Strategic Studies23(89), 95-116. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22095/jwss.2020.164003.1841
Hosseini, H. (2012). Transition to old age in Muslim countries: trends and policy requirements, Population, 80, 22-46. [In Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/318791
Hosseini, H. (2013). Socio-economic Demography and Family Planning, Fifth Edition, Bu-Ali Sina University Publication, Hamedan, Iran. [In Persian].
Hosseini, H. (2014). Conflicting situations and the problem of population policy making in Iran, Population, 22(93,94) 19-45. [In Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/387499
Hosseini, H.; Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J. (2009). Ideological changes and its impact on Kurdish and Turkish women's reproductive behavior and ideals, Women's Research, 7(2), 56-86. [In Persian]. https://jwdp.ut.ac.ir/article_19511.html
Hosseini-Chavoshi. M, Abbasi-Shavazi. M. J, McDonald. P (2016). Fertility, Marriage, and Family Planning in Iran: Implications for Future Policy, Population Horizons. 13(1), 31- 40 (2016). https://www.doi.org/10.1515/pophzn-2016-0005
Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2021). The Law of "Rejuvenation of the Population and Support of the Family", Accessable at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1678266
Kalantari, S., Abbaszadeh, M., Aminmozafari, F., & Rakeibonab, N. (2010). The Sociological Study of Attitude to Child bearing and it’s some related Factors (Case study: married youth in Tabriz City). Applied Sociology21(1), 83-104. [In Persian]. https://jas.ui.ac.ir/article_18163.html
Kayal, Suchandan; Kumar, Somesh (2013). Estimation of the Shannon’s entropy of several shifted exponential populations., Statistics & Probability Letters, 83(4), 1127-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2013.01.012
Khadivzadeh, T., Arghavani, E., & Shakeri, M. T. (2014). Relationship between Fertility Motivations and Preferences in Couples. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility17(114), 8-18. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijogi.2014.3414
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211-251.                                 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. PNAS [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences], 111(51), 18112–18115.  https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1420441111
Mahmoudi, M, J. (2010). Demographic developments, upcoming challenges and the need to revise Iran's population policies, Second Impression, 7(11 and 12), 73-41. [In Persian]. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/272069
Mason, K. O. (1997). Explaining fertility transitions. Demography, 34(4), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.2307/3038299
Modiri, F., & Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B. (2015). A Study on the Relationship between Religiousity and Fertility Intention in Tehran. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 10(20), 128-163. [In Persian].  https://www.jpaiassoc.ir/article_28035.html
Moshfegh, M., Mahmoudi, M. J., & Moti Haghshenas, N. (2012). Prospects of Iran's Demographic Changes, the Necessity of Review in Population Policies. Women's Strategic Studies14(55), 151-172. [In Persian].  https://www.jwss.ir/article_12309.html
National Organization for Civil Registration (2023). Birth data, accessable at: https://amar.sabteahval.ir/#/contentView/nHead
Noriko O. Tsuya, Minja Kim Choe, Feng Wang. (2019). Convergence to Very Low Fertility in East Asia: Processes, Causes, and Implications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55781-4
Poston, D.L., Jr, Chang, C.-F., & Dan, H. (2006). Fertility differences between the majority and minority nationality groups in China. Population Research and Policy Review25(1), 67–101.   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-0003-5
Rahimian, F. (2017). Pathology of population policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Population, 25(105), 151-127. [In Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/413960
Rai, P., Singh, S., (2010). A survey of clustering techniques, International Journal of Compututer Applications, 7(12), 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/1326-1808
Razeghi Nasrabad, H. B., & Saraei, H. (2014). A Cohort Analysis of Women's Attitude towards Value of Children in Semnan Province. Woman in Development & Politics12(2), 229-250. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2014.52357
Sadeghi, R. and Mohsenabadi, B. (2017). The Effects of Social Network on Women's Fertility Intentions and Behaviors in Tehran City. Women's Strategic Studies20(77), 87-108. [In Persian]. https://www.jwss.ir/article_120046.html
Seifoori, B., Hassani-Darmian, G., Majdi, A., & Kermani, M. (2021). Qualitative demographic evaluation of fertility among Iranian married women. Gender Issues38(4), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09267-y
Sobotka, T., Matysiak, A., Brzozowska, Z. (2020). Policy Responses to Low Fertility, [Translated to Persian by Sadghi, R & Bagi, M.]. First edition, National Population Studies and Comprehensive Management Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review37(2), 267–306.                  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x
Thornton, A., Binstock, G., Yount, K. M., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Ghimire, D., & Xie, Y. (2012). International fertility change: new data and insights from the developmental idealism framework. Demography49(2), 677–698.                                     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0097-9
Wu, P., Wu, Y., & Wu, C. (2018). Research on fertility policy in China: The relative necessity for reform among the different provinces. Social Indicators Research135(2), 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1503-2
Yazdani, A.-A., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2012). Integration of the fish bone diagram, brainstorming, and AHP method for problem solving and decision making—a case study. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology63(5–8), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3916-7
Zaidi, B., & Morgan, S. P. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology43(1), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442
Ziaei bigdeli, M T.; Kalantari, S; Alizade aghdam, M, B. (2006). The Relationship between Fertility Rate and Socio-Economic Development. Social Welfare5(21), 123-140. [In Persian]. https://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2047-en.html

  • Receive Date 23 March 2024
  • Revise Date 28 May 2024
  • Accept Date 12 June 2024